Francisco De Jesus

Francisco De Jesus

RSS

Occupy Wall Street: Support Begins to Decline

Occupy Wall Street is moving its cause across campuses throughout the country, as organizers hope to garner support from college students for the better treatment of the 99%.  However, students are not jumping on the bandwagon that quickly.

For instance, many students from St. Peter’s College are not joining protests because of the recent outbreaks of violence between both protesters and law enforcement.  The most recent breakout occurring at UC Davis, where a group of students were violently pepper sprayed in what appeared to be a peaceful protest.

With this, only 45% percent of people, according to Public Policy Polling, now oppose OWS, with many believing that people are joining because it’s a passing fad, and not being aware of the struggles ahead, whereas 33% still support it, believing that people should still protest as is their right according to the first amendment of the constitution.  Whatever the case, these signs may be showing the beginning of waning support for the OWS movement.  

Dec 8
Dec 8
Dec 8
Dec 8

Final Class Post: Viral Videos is World News

I have had a great deal of experience in filming; from filming to editing, I had felt that I didn’t need to learn anything else unless I went to an Arts School.  However, through Professor Demillo’s Video Journalism class, I have learned you never stop learning.  I gained new concepts about filming, such as more proper camera angles, editing, but most importantly, not to create a film that is visually sound, but to also tell a story.  With these new skills, I hope to present videos that can entice viewers, preferably through the internet, where everything involving news seems to be appearing more often.  This leads me to my main topic of this final class post; since the inception of Youtube, people are finding out more about news faster than actual news broadcasts reporting it.  For example, the first video on top, provided by Reelseo.com, shows the recent UC Davis students being violently pepper sprayed by a police officer in what appears to be a peaceful protest.  The video, posted on Youtube, was then viewed by millions, and it was only through this viral circulation that journalists began to catch wind of this, and broadcasted it on local news.  However, millions of people had watched the video by then, and understood the story behind it. 

This leads to one conclusion: video sites such as Youtube now drive news, not reporters or channels.  We learn about important moments in the world through the talents of everyday people.  Ordinary citizens now play the reporters, blogging about key events on sites like Facebook and Tumblr.  It is only until a certain video or news piece becomes viral that news channels notices, but by then it’s too late.  In the middle video shows a cooking show known as “Epic Meal Time,” in which a group of people make these outrageously high-calorized foods.  Overtime, it began to gain a large following of viewers in the millions.  Even when they were finally noticed by Jay Leno, and were featured them in a segment on his show (as seen in the third video on the bottom); the majority of people had already become fans of the show.  Some new channels have recognized this trend, and have used websites to broadcast news as compensation, as most people in the world look via internet for what is happening in the world.   Throughout my video journalism class, my classmates and I have been posting news on different categories such as Wall Street, posting our own videos, from How-to guides and news segments, in the hopes that people will view and comment on them.  Hopefully, they will become viral successes, and people will be well-known to the point before any other journalist finds out.  The fact is, there will come a time in which standard news will be all but dead, only surviving through everyday people such as you and me.   The way in which people receive news are changing and it will be because we will be the key players behind it.

Recently, the Occupy Wall Street movement have recently began to take to college campuses, perhaps in hopes of gaining support from young students who believe in better treatment of low-income individuals, the 99%.  However, the latest rally at the University of California did not show that whatsoever.  Instead, it showed the cruelty police officers are taking towards men and women in what is supposed to be a non-violent civil protest.  In a video taken by a protestor’s cell phone, a police officer is shown pepper spraying protestors who refused to remove themselves from where they were sitting.  While some law enforcement officials have refer to this action as “a fairly standard police procedure” many are finding the officer’s actions to be both chilling and appalling.  As for me, in terms of siding with either the actions of the police or the reactions of the protestors, I’ll stick with the latter than the former.  Maybe I can understand if the protesters were to become violent, which would force officers to protect the students at the campus by detaining them, but for an officer to have to severely blind several people, who did nothing more than sit in one place, not hurting anyone in the process, and to be assaulted the way they were, I’m not surprised over the fact that UC Davis Chancellor Linda Katehi is forming a task force to investigate the actions of the police.  Currently, I’m in the process of working on a news segment that investigates Occupy Wall Street slowly coming into campus grounds, and with all do respect to the cause these young men and women are attempting, if these protests means that potential students will be harmed, then I sincerely hope that none of this ever reaches the small community of St. Peter’s College, the school I currently attend, or any other college or university for that matter, because if it does, we may see a lot more videos than just this one from California.

In my Video Journalism Class, students we’re assigned to make a How-to Guide, giving advice to viewers on a variety of different subjects.  Some students did guides such as managing a budget, making a cake, applying make-up, or even mixing a martini.  For me, I wanted to create a film that not only pertains to my interests, but something that would interest the audience.  Through this, I not only show off my personality, but also get viewers interested within the first few seconds and wanting more without them thinking, “Is this guy crazy?”  Then, like tons of bricks, it hit me; I could make a How-to Guide on Comic-Con!  I mean, what’s better for people to be intrigued by than a bunch of people dressing up like their favorite cartoon characters and acting like complete maniacs?   So, after filming tons of footage, constant editing, and back and forth critiques my inspiration has come to fruition.  Now, I show you six simple steps that will make one’s trip at Comic-Con, or any convention in general, a hell of a lot easier in terms of money, food, and preparation.  Don’t take my word for it; see it for yourself.  Here is my How-to Guide, entitled “New York Comic-Con; A Survival Guide for Nerds.”

Below are links to my classmates’ How-To Guides.  Take a look!

Quiana Porter

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=kf9nUFplVEU#!

Phylecia Palmer

http://vimeo.com/32020537

Dylan Smith

http://vimeo.com/31932749

Myrvancia Estimable

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OemXr6_ZIeY

Chelci Bidos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=maXgDo29-6w

Corey Brown

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxvgNZmbRLw&feature=player_embedded

Harley Cabrera

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=GUxC8-q7hiI

Natalie Chavez

Eric Soimes

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9curkgjpKyI&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fneed2watch.tumblr.com%2F&feature=player_embedded

Dale Tyus

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uODSDcwiZ_I&feature=player_embedded

Nov 2

So our Video Journalism class were assigned to find a video from an accredited news site and critique it in terms of editing; what we thought was good, and what we believed could of been done better.  For me, I found a video from CNN’s website.  In a segment from American Morning, it involved the former secretary of state to the Bush administration, Condoleezza Rice.  Shortly after the 9/11 attacks, she, then-president George W. Bush, and a number of other members of the Bush administration thought that they had been poisoned during a trip to Shanghai.  Former vice-president Dick Cheney had explained to them that White House security detected high levels of poison that could of possibly killed them.  Fortunately, tests received 24 hours later revealed that Bush, Rice, and the rest of the administration were negative for anything hazardous in their bodies.

In regards to the filming perspective of the segment, I believed that they did an good job.  They showed a balance of interviews, photography and filming.  What impressed me the most was the fact that the footage they used was during Bush’s trip to Shanghai, establishing viewers the location in which the panic had began.  As far as anything that could of been different, I would of like to see photos of them actually finding out that they were potentially poisoned in order to visually see their actual emotional response.  Also, when the newswoman talked about how the testing proved that they were clean, the editors could of shown an actual lab doing test as potential B-roll.  At the same time, however, it is understandable that the editors did not do this because it would break continuity with the rest of the footage.

VII or X?  That is the Question….
Our Video Journalism class, in order to prepare editing our “How-To” assignments, took time to learn Final Cut Pro, an editing software program that is used by any serious film editor or company.  Our class, oddly enough, learned Final Cut VII, the previous model, and the newest release, X, giving our class a massive difference in software and functions.  This post will discuss the differences between the two, and give my overall opinion on which is superior. 
Already experienced in Final Cut 7, I got to see the difference X gives off from its predecessor.  VII is already as professional as it gets, with a variety of different export conversions, advanced editing tools, and 3-way color correction.  Therefore, I had high expectations for this new version.  Unfortunately, it failed to impress.
Now before I go off ranting on how Final Cut X is not as great as VII, I will give credit where it’s due; Final Cut X is very easy to master to anyone new to editing.  It takes both iMovie and Final Cut, brings them together, and had hot, steaming, electronic sex, giving birth to this program that incorporates the two properties into one.  It enables editors to automatically sync separate audio clips (in cases where the camera’s speakers are not enough) together.  This allows more time-convenient workflow rather than having to go back and forth with two audio clips, trying to sync them together manually.   Among other advantages includes automatic import of photos and music from iMovie and iTunes respectively, tools that are easy to use with practice, and cool new effects and transitions.  For those new to the Final Cut franchise, this is a program you would enjoy.
However, as someone who has worked on massive projects on program that once had a much larger influx of functions no longer available, it makes for a huge disappointment.  One of those disadvantages is the form the 3-way color correction; Final Cut X makes the function different, or at least in a style I’m not used to.  While the overall layout and new functions have me intrigued, it’s going to take a whole lot more than that to get me hooked.  That said, it doesn’t mean that I’m not going to give it a try and see if I can’t be.  In conclusion, as far as making my how-to guide on surviving Comic-con, or any video assignment in general, , between Final Cut VII and X, it’s not a questions on which is better, but in which I’m more used to, which would hands-down be the former than the latter.

VII or X?  That is the Question….

Our Video Journalism class, in order to prepare editing our “How-To” assignments, took time to learn Final Cut Pro, an editing software program that is used by any serious film editor or company.  Our class, oddly enough, learned Final Cut VII, the previous model, and the newest release, X, giving our class a massive difference in software and functions.  This post will discuss the differences between the two, and give my overall opinion on which is superior.

Already experienced in Final Cut 7, I got to see the difference X gives off from its predecessor.  VII is already as professional as it gets, with a variety of different export conversions, advanced editing tools, and 3-way color correction.  Therefore, I had high expectations for this new version.  Unfortunately, it failed to impress.

Now before I go off ranting on how Final Cut X is not as great as VII, I will give credit where it’s due; Final Cut X is very easy to master to anyone new to editing.  It takes both iMovie and Final Cut, brings them together, and had hot, steaming, electronic sex, giving birth to this program that incorporates the two properties into one.  It enables editors to automatically sync separate audio clips (in cases where the camera’s speakers are not enough) together.  This allows more time-convenient workflow rather than having to go back and forth with two audio clips, trying to sync them together manually.   Among other advantages includes automatic import of photos and music from iMovie and iTunes respectively, tools that are easy to use with practice, and cool new effects and transitions.  For those new to the Final Cut franchise, this is a program you would enjoy.

However, as someone who has worked on massive projects on program that once had a much larger influx of functions no longer available, it makes for a huge disappointment.  One of those disadvantages is the form the 3-way color correction; Final Cut X makes the function different, or at least in a style I’m not used to.  While the overall layout and new functions have me intrigued, it’s going to take a whole lot more than that to get me hooked.  That said, it doesn’t mean that I’m not going to give it a try and see if I can’t be.  In conclusion, as far as making my how-to guide on surviving Comic-con, or any video assignment in general, , between Final Cut VII and X, it’s not a questions on which is better, but in which I’m more used to, which would hands-down be the former than the latter.